In implementing the structured inquiry lesson, it became very evident that my students learning was positively impacted. Learning was demonstrated clearly through the samples below.
The first student sample is the data page that each student collected throughout the experiment. The students had to use measuring skills with a stopwatch for the time and a trundle wheel for distance. The students also had to master the mathematical skill of rounding when finding the mean of the data. It is clear that the student, Cole, in the first link, had a good base knowledge of measuring and averaging. His data mostly makes sense and he really did a thorough job. The only critique is that he did not write in my example for distance. This is a minor detail, but did not have an impact on my evaluation of his personal data collection skills.
In the next student sample , I love how the student mentioned in number 10 that the student energy is saved. His conclusion tells me that he has mastered the concept in number 11. He states that the more potential energy you have, the more kinetic energy you release. This is a solid example of his understanding.
I love that in this next sample, this student identified that the energy comes from the pilot in number 2. This student also hypothesized that the potential energy was recognized after spinning the propeller. This student proved to me that he knew the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in the answers to numbers 7 and 9. He states that the more you spin it (propeller), the longer and farther it will go. I was so impressed at the connections the students were making.
Finally, the last sample link represents a deeper thinking student. This student claimed that the energy for the plane to move was provided by the rubberband and the propeller and that the potential energy is stored in the rubberband when you hold it. This was an interesting perspective because no credit was given to the person who was actually winding the plane. This was one of the only papers where the student did not look at the energy that was being put into the propeller, but only at the outcome of the stored energy and the result. After talking to this student during the experiment, she realized that energy was not being created and that the pilot was actually putting a lot of energy into the spinning. I love how kid friendly the final relationship is stated in answer to number 11. The more potential you have stored up, the more kinetic you get back. The end result for this student resulted in a deeper understanding overall.
It was awesome to have the students conduct this experiment at their own speed following the guidelines and procedures that I outlined at the beginning of class. It was a wonderful feeling to walk around and witness the self-discovery that was taking place. It is amazing to see what students can do with a bit of guidance and direction. This structured inquiry was the perfect way to teach potential and kinetic energy.
You have posted a very thoughtful and well-planned out lesson incorporating the structured inquiry based learning. What a great accomplishment to put so much detailed effort into preparing lesson where your students benefit in their learning experience. Potential and kinetic energy can be a challenging concept but it appears that the students were able to take charge of their learning and work at their own pace. I am glad for you that you had a positive experience.
ReplyDeleteHi!
ReplyDeleteI was just curious - were there any students for whom this lesson was particularly challenging? My impression is that most of your students have a very strong science background, but I was wondering if some of your struggling students were helped along by other members of their group, and/or if your participation and checking for understanding during the activity was enough to "get them over the hump", so to speak. I agree with Donna that potential and kinetic energy can be very challenging, which is why I ask :) Amy
Edit Anonymous said... I absolutely needed the cooperative groups to make this activity work. The kids were paired up according to strong science background and those that need more of a foundation. The conversations in the groups really helped the students who did not have the best science background to understand. I am blessed that many of my students are pretty talented in science, however, there are those kids that needed extra support. I also did rotate around to the different groups so that I could help to ensure that the concepts were internalized
ReplyDelete